Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 6900 XT is 4256 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT - 150 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Performs up to 261% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GTS 250 - 166 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 16 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$932.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $932.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6744 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Navi II |
$199 | MSRP | $999 |
2x DVI | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1825 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |