Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 9100 is 3050 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 - 150 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100
- Performs up to 83% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GTS 250 - 84 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 16 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
FPS
84
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$946.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $946.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7005 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$199 | MSRP | $1599 |
2x DVI | Outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | HBM2 |
256-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1200 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |