Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTS 250 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTS 250 is 3772 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 65 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
44
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $138.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5323 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
43.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
95%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$199 | MSRP | $199 |
2x DVI | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |