In The Last of Us Part II, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is same performance as the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Jun 03, 2013 vs Oct 12, 2009
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 31 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 210: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 210: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 210: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
45%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
5%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce 210 Oct 12th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
