In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much faster than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Up to 440% faster in Atomfall – 27 vs 5 FPS
- Up to 440% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Jun 03, 2013 vs Oct 12, 2009
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 31 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 210: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 210: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 210: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
45%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
5%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce 210 Oct 12th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
