In The Last of Us Part II, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much slower than the Arc A580. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 45 vs 175 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
Arc A580
- Up to 6100% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 62 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 6100% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Oct 10, 2023 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A580: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A580
Oct 10th, 2023
Average FPS
62 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.9/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A580: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A580: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
6%
Arc A580
Oct 10th, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
192 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A580 Oct 10th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Oct 10th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 5) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
