In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much slower than the Arc A580. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 45 vs 175 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
Arc A580
- Up to 159% faster in Atomfall – 70 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 159% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Oct 10, 2023 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A580: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
39%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
38%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A580
Oct 10th, 2023
Average FPS
70 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A580: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A580: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
6%
Arc A580
Oct 10th, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
192 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A580 Oct 10th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Oct 10th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 5) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
