In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is quite a bit slower than the Arc A310. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
No clear advantages
Arc A310
- Up to 47% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 63 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 47% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 30 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 33% less energy
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A310: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
43 FPS
68%
Min 1% FPS
32 FPS
68%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
63 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
100%
Price, $
$118.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A310: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A310: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
16%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
82%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
27%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
