In Gears 5, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much slower than the Arc A310. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
No clear advantages
Arc A310
- Up to 3000% faster in Gears 5 – 31 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 3000% faster in Gears 5
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 30 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 33% less energy
Gears 5 FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A310: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
31 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
19 FPS
100%
Price, $
$118.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.83/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A310: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A310: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
16%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
82%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
27%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |

















































































































































