In Rust, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is quite a bit slower than the Arc A770M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 30 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
Arc A770M
- Up to 81% faster in Rust – 168 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 81% faster in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A770M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
93 FPS
55%
Min 1% FPS
70 FPS
56%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A770M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A770M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
5%
Arc A770M
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
262.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
524.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.79 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7 Mobile) |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
