In GRID, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is much slower than the Arc A770M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 30 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
Arc A770M
- Up to 190% faster in GRID – 87 vs 30 FPS
- Up to 190% faster in GRID
GRID FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A770M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
30 FPS
34%
Min 1% FPS
22 FPS
37%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A770M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A770M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
5%
Arc A770M
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
262.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
524.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.79 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7 Mobile) |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
