In Rust, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is quite a bit slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 30 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 92% faster in Rust – 179 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 92% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
93 FPS
52%
Min 1% FPS
70 FPS
52%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
179 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
134 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.56/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
4%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |























































































































































