In Control, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 30 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 114% faster in Control – 94 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 114% faster in Control
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
44 FPS
47%
Min 1% FPS
33 FPS
47%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
94 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
70 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
4%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |























































































































































