In Rust, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is slower than the Arc A310. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
No clear advantages
Arc A310
- Up to 28% faster in Rust – 119 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A310: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
93 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
70 FPS
79%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
119 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.45
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A310: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A310: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
86%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
29%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| 30 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
