In Deathloop, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is quite a bit slower than the Arc A310. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
No clear advantages
Arc A310
- Up to 72% faster in Deathloop – 81 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 72% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A310: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
47 FPS
58%
Min 1% FPS
35 FPS
57%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
81 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.45
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A310: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A310: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
86%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
29%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| 30 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
