Key Differences
In short — Arc A770 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A770 is 1268 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of Intel Arc A770
- Performs up to 50% better in Rust than GeForce GTX 1650 - 147 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 16 vs 4 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 72% cheaper than Arc A770 - $154.99 vs $560.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Rust than Arc A770 - $1.58 vs $3.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Arc A770 - 75 vs 225 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $560 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
98
66%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$154.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
17%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
15%
Intel Arc A770 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$329 | MSRP | $149 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
2100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |