Key Differences
In short — Arc A770 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A770 is 1268 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of Intel Arc A770
- Performs up to 85% better in Deathloop than GeForce GTX 1650 - 113 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 16 vs 4 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 63% cheaper than Arc A770 - $149.99 vs $399.99
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Arc A770 - 75 vs 225 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74098 minutes ago
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
17.343750000000004%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
15.17578125%
Intel Arc A770 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$329 | MSRP | $149 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
2100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |