Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 390 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 390 is 1405 days older than the more expensive GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 390 - 75 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Warcraft than GeForce GTX 1650 - 151 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - $129.0 vs $149.99
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73851 minutes ago
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73852 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
83.25%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
58.275%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$149 | MSRP | $329 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |