Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A750 is 4642 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 43% better in Far Cry 3 than GeForce GT 220 - 184 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 79% cheaper than Arc A750 - $49.96 vs $239.99
- Up to 70% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Arc A750 - $0.39 vs $1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 58 vs 225 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16260 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
FPS
129
70%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16261 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Theoretical Performance
Intel Arc A750 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2010 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$289 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR3 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 22.4 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 600 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 700 MHz |