Key Differences
In short — GeForce GT 220 outperforms GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GT 220 is 106 days newer than GeForce 210.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 1 vs 0 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 31 vs 58 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
FPS
19
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36073 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
43.333333333333336%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
28.888888888888893%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |