Key Differences
In short — Arc A310 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A310 is 4642 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 50% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GeForce GT 220 - 36 vs 24 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 30 vs 58 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 50% cheaper than Arc A310 - $49.96 vs $99.99
- Up to 25% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Arc A310 - $2.08 vs $2.78 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
FPS
24
66%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Theoretical Performance
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2010 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR3 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 22.4 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 600 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 700 MHz |