In Atomfall, the HD Graphics 610 Mobile is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
HD Graphics 610 Mobile
- Consumes up to 98% less energy – 5 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 98% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 231% faster in Atomfall – 86 vs 26 FPS
- Up to 231% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Aug 30, 2016
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
HD Graphics 610 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
HD Graphics 610 Mobile
Aug 30th, 2016
Average FPS
26 FPS
30%
Min 1% FPS
19 FPS
30%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
HD Graphics 610 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
HD Graphics 610 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
HD Graphics 610 Mobile
Aug 30th, 2016
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
1.8 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
10.8 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
172.8 GFLOPS
1%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
HD Graphics 610 Mobile Aug 30th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 30th, 2016 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| HD Graphics-M (Kaby Lake) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
5 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
