In Atomfall, the HD Graphics 610 Mobile is much slower than the Arc B580. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
HD Graphics 610 Mobile
- Consumes up to 97% less energy – 5 vs 190 Watts
- Consumes up to 97% less energy
Arc B580
- Up to 227% faster in Atomfall – 85 vs 26 FPS
- Up to 227% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer – Dec 13, 2024 vs Aug 30, 2016
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
HD Graphics 610 Mobile vs Arc B580: Comparison of performance and price
HD Graphics 610 Mobile
Aug 30th, 2016
Average FPS
26 FPS
31%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
31%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc B580
Dec 13th, 2024
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$299.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
HD Graphics 610 Mobile vs Arc B580: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
HD Graphics 610 Mobile vs Arc B580: Comparison of core performance specifications
HD Graphics 610 Mobile
Aug 30th, 2016
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
1.8 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
10.8 GTexel/s
3%
FP32
172.8 GFLOPS
1%
Arc B580
Dec 13th, 2024
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
456 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
213.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
427.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.67 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
HD Graphics 610 Mobile Aug 30th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc B580 Dec 13th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 30th, 2016 | Released | Dec 13th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $249.00 |
| HD Graphics-M (Kaby Lake) | Generation | Battlemage (Arc 5) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
5 W | Power Consumption | 190 W |
