In The Last of Us Part II, the HD Graphics 510 is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
HD Graphics 510
- Consumes up to 93% less energy – 15 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 93% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 7500% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 76 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 7500% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
HD Graphics 510 vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
HD Graphics 510 vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
HD Graphics 510 vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
HD Graphics 510
Sep 1st, 2015
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
1.9 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
11.4 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
182.4 GFLOPS
1%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
HD Graphics 510 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| HD Graphics (Skylake) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
