In Atomfall, the HD Graphics 510 is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
HD Graphics 510
- Consumes up to 93% less energy – 15 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 93% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 231% faster in Atomfall – 86 vs 26 FPS
- Up to 231% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
HD Graphics 510 vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
HD Graphics 510 vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
HD Graphics 510 vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
HD Graphics 510
Sep 1st, 2015
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
1.9 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
11.4 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
182.4 GFLOPS
1%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
HD Graphics 510 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| HD Graphics (Skylake) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15W | Power Consumption | 225W |
