In Atomfall, the GeForce MX350 is much faster than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce MX350
- Up to 340% faster in Atomfall – 22 vs 5 FPS
- Up to 340% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Feb 10, 2020 vs Oct 12, 2009
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 20 vs 31 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 2 vs 0 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
GeForce 210
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce MX350 vs GeForce 210: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce MX350 vs GeForce 210: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce MX350 vs GeForce 210: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.1994 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
11%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
14%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
3%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce MX350 Feb 10th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce 210 Oct 12th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 10th, 2020 | Released | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| GeForce MX (3xx) | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
20 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
