In Atomfall, the GeForce 210 is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 31 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 1620% faster in Atomfall – 86 vs 5 FPS
- Up to 1620% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Oct 12, 2009
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 3100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 0 GB
- Up to 3100% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce 210 vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce 210 vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce 210 vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
3%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
1%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
1%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
0%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce 210 Oct 12th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2009 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
31 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
