The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5700 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $180.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Up to 69% cheaper – $79.98 vs $259.99
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 60 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Feb 18th, 2014
Average FPS
48
49%
Min 1% FPS
20
37%
Price, $
$79.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, $
$259.99
30%
Value, $/FPS
$2.65/FPS
63%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Feb 18th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
19%
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
1.389 TFLOPS
16%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Feb 18th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
GeForce 700 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
60 W | Power Consumption | 205 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
17.36 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 120.3 GPixel/s |
43.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 270.7 GTexel/s |
1.389 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.663 TFLOPS |