The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5500 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $82.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Up to 51% cheaper – $79.98 vs $161.99
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 60 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Feb 18th, 2014
Average FPS
48
66%
Min 1% FPS
20
54%
Price, $
$79.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$161.99
49%
Value, $/FPS
$2.21/FPS
75%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5500 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Feb 18th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
39%
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
29%
Texture Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
27%
FP32
1.389 TFLOPS
27%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.224 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 18th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 10th, 2020 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 700 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
60 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.36 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 59.36 GPixel/s |
| 43.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 163.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.389 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.224 TFLOPS |
