The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a much faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $229.23 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 120 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- Up to 66% cheaper – $119.99 vs $349.22
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 590 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, $
$349.22
34%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
39%
Buy on Amazon
$349.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.99
In Stock
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
88%
Min 1% FPS
37
84%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 590 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 590 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 590 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
76%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
76%
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
89%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
58%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 15th, 2018 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
84.96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 49.44 GPixel/s |
169.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 222.5 GTexel/s |
5.437 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.119 TFLOPS |