The Arc A310 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $50.10 more expensive!
Advantages of the Arc A310
- Consumes up to 83% less energy – 30 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 31% cheaper – $109.99 vs $160.09
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Arc A310 vs Radeon RX 590 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
$160.09
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$146.86
In Stock
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$109.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$109.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$129.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$109.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Arc A310 vs Radeon RX 590 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A310 vs Radeon RX 590 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A310 vs Radeon RX 590 in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
48%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
57%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
38%
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A310 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 15th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Alchemist (Arc 3) | Generation | Polaris (RX 500) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 28 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 49.44 GPixel/s |
| 56 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| 2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.119 TFLOPS |
