The GeForce GTX 1650 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560 and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's only $142.30 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- Up to 41% cheaper – $206.70 vs $349.00
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 560 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, $
$349
59%
Value, $/FPS
$5.45/FPS
73%
Buy on Amazon
$349.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$273.45
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$224.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.12
In Stock
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
81%
Min 1% FPS
23
74%
Price, $
$206.7
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.97/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
87%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
38%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
88%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
88%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| $149.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
53.28 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
93.24 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
2.984 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |
