In The Last of Us Part II, the GeForce GTX 1650 is much slower than the Arc A770 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $30 cheaper!
GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 11% cheaper – $249.99 vs $279.99
- Up to 11% cheaper
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 75 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 485% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 76 vs 13 FPS
- Up to 485% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 81% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $3.68 vs $19.23/FPS
- Up to 81% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
13 FPS
17%
Min 1% FPS
10 FPS
18%
Price, $
$249.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$19.23/FPS
19%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
89%
Value, $/FPS
$3.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
25%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
15%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
15%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
