In The Last of Us Part II, the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 50 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 78% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 533% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 76 vs 12 FPS
- Up to 533% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Apr 15, 2020
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Apr 15th, 2020
Average FPS
12 FPS
16%
Min 1% FPS
9 FPS
16%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Apr 15th, 2020
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
38%
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
16%
Texture Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
3.103 TFLOPS
16%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Apr 15th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 15th, 2020 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
