In Atomfall, the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 50 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 78% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 132% faster in Atomfall – 86 vs 37 FPS
- Up to 132% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Apr 15, 2020
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Apr 15th, 2020
Average FPS
37 FPS
43%
Min 1% FPS
27 FPS
42%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Apr 15th, 2020
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
38%
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
16%
Texture Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
3.103 TFLOPS
16%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Apr 15th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 15th, 2020 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
