The GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $78.24 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 120 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 22% cheaper – $271.75 vs $349.99
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Aug 18th, 2016
Average FPS
66
54%
Min 1% FPS
33
46%
Price, $
$349.99
77%
Value, $/FPS
$5.3/FPS
42%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, $
$271.75
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$271.75
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$280.08
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$302.17
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$279.00
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Aug 18th, 2016
Memory
3 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
38%
Pixel Fillrate
81.98 GPixel/s
30%
Texture Fillrate
123 GTexel/s
23%
FP32
3.935 TFLOPS
23%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 18th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
GeForce 10 | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
Memory | ||
3 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
192.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
81.98 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
123 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
3.935 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |