In The Last of Us Part II, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 75 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 7500% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 76 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 7500% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Jan 03, 2018
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
22%
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
13%
Texture Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
1.983 TFLOPS
10%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q Jan 3rd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2018 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
