In The Last of Us Part II, the GeForce GT 645M is much slower than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GT 645M
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 32 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
Arc A750
- Up to 6900% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 70 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 6900% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 10 years and 10 days newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Oct 01, 2012
- Is 10 years and 10 days newer
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
GeForce GT 645M vs Arc A750: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
70 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
100%
Price, $
$526.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GT 645M vs Arc A750: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GT 645M vs Arc A750: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GT 645M
Oct 1st, 2012
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
24.96 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
3%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GT 645M Oct 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A750 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 1st, 2012 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $289.00 |
| GeForce 600M | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
32 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
