In Atomfall, the GeForce GT 645M is much slower than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GT 645M
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 32 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
Arc A750
- Up to 295% faster in Atomfall – 75 vs 19 FPS
- Up to 295% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 10 days newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Oct 01, 2012
- Is 10 years and 10 days newer
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce GT 645M vs Arc A750: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
75 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
100%
Price, $
$526.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.02/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GT 645M vs Arc A750: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GT 645M vs Arc A750: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GT 645M
Oct 1st, 2012
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
24.96 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
3%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GT 645M Oct 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A750 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 1st, 2012 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $289.00 |
| GeForce 600M | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
32 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
