In Deathloop, the GeForce GT 435M is much slower than the Arc A310. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GT 435M
No clear advantages
Arc A310
- Up to 138% faster in Deathloop – 81 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 138% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Sep 03, 2010
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 14% less energy – 30 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 14% less energy
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory
Deathloop FPS Calculator
GeForce GT 435M vs Arc A310: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
81 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GT 435M vs Arc A310: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GT 435M vs Arc A310: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GT 435M
Sep 3rd, 2010
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
21%
Pixel Fillrate
2.6 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
10.4 GTexel/s
19%
FP32
249.6 GFLOPS
9%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GT 435M Sep 3rd, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 35W | Power Consumption | 30W |
