In Atomfall, the GeForce GT 435M is quite a bit slower than the Arc A310. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GT 435M
No clear advantages
Arc A310
- Up to 79% faster in Atomfall – 34 vs 19 FPS
- Up to 79% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Sep 03, 2010
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 14% less energy – 30 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 14% less energy
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce GT 435M vs Arc A310: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
34 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
26 FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GT 435M vs Arc A310: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GT 435M vs Arc A310: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GT 435M
Sep 3rd, 2010
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
21%
Pixel Fillrate
2.6 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
10.4 GTexel/s
19%
FP32
249.6 GFLOPS
9%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GT 435M Sep 3rd, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 35W | Power Consumption | 30W |
