In Atomfall, the GeForce 930MX is much faster than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce 930MX
- Up to 300% faster in Atomfall – 20 vs 5 FPS
- Up to 300% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Mar 01, 2016 vs Oct 12, 2009
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 17 vs 31 Watts
- Consumes up to 45% less energy
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 2 vs 0 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
GeForce 210
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce 930MX vs GeForce 210: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce 930MX vs GeForce 210: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce 930MX vs GeForce 210: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce 930MX
Mar 1st, 2016
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
8.16 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
24.48 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
783.4 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
25%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
17%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
5%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce 930MX Mar 1st, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce 210 Oct 12th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2016 | Released | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
17 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
