In Atomfall, the GeForce 930M is much faster than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce 930M
- Up to 280% faster in Atomfall – 19 vs 5 FPS
- Up to 280% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Mar 13, 2015 vs Oct 12, 2009
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 2 vs 0 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 6% less energy – 31 vs 33 Watts
- Consumes up to 6% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce 930M vs GeForce 210: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce 930M vs GeForce 210: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce 930M vs GeForce 210: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce 930M
Mar 13th, 2015
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
4.392 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
13.18 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
421.6 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
47%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
32%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
9%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce 930M Mar 13th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce 210 Oct 12th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 13th, 2015 | Released | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 33 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
