Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms GeForce GTX 980 Ti on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 2689 days newer than GeForce GTX 980 Ti.
Advantages of Arc A750
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than GeForce GTX 980 Ti - 91 vs 74 FPS
- Up to 74% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than GeForce GTX 980 Ti - $3.52 vs $13.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti - 225 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
91
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$320.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $320.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Buy for $998 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
38%
Texel Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
35%
Arc A750 | vs | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 900 |
$289 | MSRP | $649 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336.6 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1076 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1753 MHz |