The Arc A370M is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A370M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 35 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
The Arc A370M is better in every way
Arc A370M vs Radeon RX 560
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Arc A370M
Mar 30th, 2022
Average FPS
66
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
55
83%
Min 1% FPS
23
74%
Price, $
$209.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.8/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$209.02
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$109.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Arc A370M vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A370M vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A370M vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A370M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
62%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
62%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A370M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $99.00 |
| Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile) | Generation | Polaris (RX 500) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
65.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
131.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
4.198 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |
