Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon RX 6950 XT is 1173 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
- Performs up to 308% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 98 vs 24 FPS
- Up to 23% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - $7.31 vs $9.45 per FPS
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 16 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 68% cheaper than Radeon RX 6950 XT - $226.72 vs $715.95
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT - 120 vs 335 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 10th, 2022
FPS
98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$715.95
31%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $715.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14001 minutes ago
Buy for $226.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14002 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 10th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 10th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
28%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
22%
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
May 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Navi II | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$1099 | MSRP | $279 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
2x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
576 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1860 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
2310 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
2250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |