Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 2497 days older than GeForce GTX 1630.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 14% better in Rust than GeForce GTX 1630 - 104 vs 91 FPS
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 75 vs 175 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
FPS
91
87%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$173.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $173.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
22%
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 28th, 2022 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$649 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
HBM | Type | GDDR6 |
4096-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1740 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |