Key Differences
In short — Arc A310 outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A310 is 3144 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 78% better in Overwatch 2 than Radeon R9 280 - 48 vs 27 FPS
- Consumes up to 85% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 30 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
48
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18841 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 280 | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
$279 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
384-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
827 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
933 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |