Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 1215 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 12% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 19 vs 17 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 65 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 4 vs 2 GB
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
FPS
17
89%
Value, $/FPS
$10/FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
65%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
65%
AMD Radeon R7 265 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$149 | MSRP | $199 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
900 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
925 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |