Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 1650: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 OC 4G (rev. 4.0) Graphics Card, 4GB GDDR6 128-bit, GV-N1656OC-4GD G40 Video Card

Buy for $154.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 102 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 OC 4G (rev. 4.0) Graphics Card, 4GB GDDR6 128-bit, GV-N1656OC-4GD G40 Video Card

Buy for $154.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 102 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R7 265 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1895 days newer than Radeon R7 265.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

  • Performs up to 33% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon R7 265 - 64 vs 48 FPS
  • Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 75 vs 150 Watts
  • Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 4 vs 2 GB
This is a free version of Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0.
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

AMD Radeon R7 265 Logo
Radeon R7 265

Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014


FPS

48

75%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

64

100%

Value, $/FPS

$2.42/FPS

100%

Price, $

$154.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 OC 4G (rev. 4.0) Graphics Card, 4GB GDDR6 128-bit, GV-N1656OC-4GD G40 Video Card

Buy for $154.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 102 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

AMD Radeon R7 265 Logo
Radeon R7 265

Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon R7 265 Logo
Radeon R7 265

Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014


Pixel Fillrate

29.6 GPixel/s

55%

Texel Fillrate

59.2 GTexel/s

63%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon R7 265 Logo

AMD Radeon R7 265

vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Feb 13th, 2014Release Date
Apr 23rd, 2019
Volcanic IslandsGenerationGeForce 16
$149MSRP$149
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortOutputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pinPower ConnectorsNone
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2 GBMemory
4 GB
GDDR5TypeGDDR5
256-bitBus128-bit
179.2 GB/s
Bandwidth128.1 GB/s
900 MHzBase Clock Speed
1485 MHz
925 MHzBoost Clock Speed
1665 MHz
1400 MHzMemory Clock Speed
2001 MHz

Builds Using Radeon R7 265 or GeForce GTX 1650

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, 1920 x 1080, Extreme

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.