Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1630 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1630 is 3185 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 - 55 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- Performs up to 12% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Radeon R7 250 - 72 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $74.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
51.820728291316534%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
51.820728291316534%
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 28th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1740 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |